Science News

Backstory: Origins of the COVID-19 Virus

Guest contribution by Dave Archibald

Who does the virus call "Daddy"? In the 1950s, oil geologist Michel Halbouty said that "oil is first found in people's minds," which means that one has to imagine the existence of an oil field before they can find it. The same is true of most of the fruits of spiritual effort.

Similarly, the COVID-19 virus is artificial, so someone thought it in their head before it was created in the laboratory.

The construction of the place where the virus was generated, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, was funded by the French government in 2004 to ingratiate itself with the Chinese dictatorship. Once completed, the Chinese only let one French into the building.

3D architecture rendering from http://english.whiov.cas.cn/About_Us2016/Brief_Introduction2016/

The events that led to the creation of the virus began decades earlier with the founding of the Wildlife Trust in 1971 by English nature lover Gerald Durrell. The headquarters were relocated to New York. In 1997 the Wildlife Trust established the Consortium for Conservation Medicine. This organization has been described as "a unique collaborative institution that seeks to understand the relationship between anthropogenic environmental change, the health of all species and the conservation of biodiversity."

In other words, it is a spiritual home for health scientists concerned about global warming.

The Wildlife Trust and the Consortium for Conservation Medicine merged in 2010 to form the EcoHealth Alliance. One benefit of the name change would have been that the state health authorities could give their money.

Dr. Anthony Fauci and his offsider at the National Institutes of Health, David Morens, have been publishing articles like this since 2004. In this article, intent to cause harm is listed as a factor that contributes to the development of infectious diseases. This is expanded in a paragraph on "Intentional Infections":

Deliberate microbes are those that are developed by humans, usually for nefarious purposes. The term “deliberately appearing” refers to both naturally occurring microbial agents such as anthrax 6 and bioengineered microorganisms such as those created by the insertion of genetic virulence factors that cause or worsen disease. Intentional microbes include microorganisms or toxins that are manufactured in a form that would cause maximum harm due to ease of spread, increased infectivity, or increased pathogenicity.

The first of the subsequent papers by Fauci and Morens that mentioned "global warming causing disease" was this one in 2008. Around the same time, virus researchers in the US began doing interesting things. In two laboratories, the avian flu strain H5N1 has been modified so that it can be more easily transmitted between ferrets. Ferrets use the same cellular receptors as humans for the virus, and strains that infect humans spread among ferrets and cause similar symptoms. This is "gain in function" research which is another way of saying they tried to make deadly viruses even more deadly. Because of mishaps in the laboratory, gaining functional research was banned in the US in 2012.

At that time, someone, a Nicholas Evans, hit Fauci's idea fixe. In response to a paper co-authored by Fauci's pal Morens, this phrase goes:

To claim that nature conducts research plays quickly and easily with the criteria; This nature breaks the rules and smells like an animism that is difficult to fathom.

Fauci has animism, the association of a soul with plants, inanimate objects and natural phenomena, really bad.

Fauci responded to the ban on the gain of functional research by bringing it to China. This was channeled through his ideological soulmate at the EcoHealth Alliance. As Rudi Giuliani said in an interview:

As early as 2014, the Obama administration banned the US from giving money to a laboratory, including in the US, that wanted to fool around with these viruses. Forbidden. Even so, Dr. Fauci gave $ 3.7 million to the Wuhan lab. And even after the State Department released reports about how unsafe this lab was and how suspicious they were of developing a virus that could be transmitted to humans, we never withdrew that money.

Because of this, the US Consulate in Wuhan visited the laboratory several times and wrote reports complaining about the poor biosafety standards. A laboratory accident has occurred at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Satellite imagery shows roadblocks around the lab from Oct 6-11, 2019. This is supported by U.S. cellular traffic mapping, which revealed a decrease in traffic from the affected building. The Russians realized that troop movements could be mapped from the US using cell phone data, and Putin banned Russian troops from carrying cell phones a week later.

The virus spread. It is known that zinc inhibits virus replication. Doctors in Wuhan recalled a 2014 paper showing that chloroquine was a zinc ionophore and found it was effective in treating infected patients. On May 22, 2020, the medical journal The Lancet joyfully published an article stating that chloroquine does not work. Medical authorities around the world responded by withdrawing chloroquine from treatment for the Wuhan virus. About two weeks later, death rates rose dramatically. This shows the experience in Switzerland, as shown in the following graphic from France Soir:

The gray shaded area is the time of increased deaths in Switzerland due to the study in The Lancet. The death rate increased 13 days after chloroquine administration was discontinued and decreased 13 days after chloroquine administration was discontinued. That was just Switzerland. The Lancet withdrew the paper on June 4, more because of the damage it did to its reputation than because of embarrassment over the number of deaths it caused. Nobody in the media has shown any interest in who is behind this success with chloroquine.

It has been estimated that the media flash against chloroquine resulted in 80,000 deaths worldwide.

Similar success was attempted with the diabetic metformin, which had also been shown to be effective against the Wuhan virus. From the comments it appears that "Hydroxychloroquine has only had excellent results for the prophylaxis of diabetes" in an April 2019 article. So it appears that diabetics are effective against the Wuhan virus, perhaps all of them. This is due to a decreased conversion of sugar to fat. Chloroquine combines this effect with a zinc ionophore.

Someone funded the successful chloroquine and metformin jobs, but there was no interest in finding out what motivated them. The lesson is that medical researchers are very happy to kill tens of thousands of people when you cross their palms with silver. So you can imagine how quickly climatologists can uphold their scam – no one dies instantly and they may not be proven false for decades.

Now back to Dr. Fauci. In September, he and buddy Morens released the latest version of their 2004 paper. Fauci's worldview is briefly summarized in this paragraph from the September 2020 paper:

The COVID-19 pandemic is another reminder added to the rapidly growing archive of historical memories that we are increasingly creating new diseases in a human-dominated world where our human activities represent aggressive, harmful, and unbalanced interactions with nature become emergencies. We remain in danger for the foreseeable future. COVID-19 is one of the liveliest wake-up calls in over a century. It should force us to think seriously and collectively about living in a more thoughtful and creative harmony with nature.

What does that remind us of? It reminds us of the Unabombers Manifesto, in which it was partly stated that the modern

"… exposed people to outrage, led to widespread psychological suffering (including physical suffering in the Third World) and caused serious damage to the natural world."

Fauci's writing style is better than Unabomber's, but otherwise there is no difference. But now we have motivation. Why would Fauci send all that money to the Wuhan lab knowing that they were using it to manipulate bat viruses to make them contagious in humans?

He's a global warmer and the warmers have a big problem. The world has not warmed up as predicted, but remains stubbornly pleasant. The appearance of the Wuhan virus suggests (at least for those who believe in such things) that nature is taking revenge on humans for not living in harmony with it. Dr. Fauci only helped him a little with the means and the motivation.

President Trump has said China will have to pay for the Wuhan virus. Not so fast. It is possible that some research has indicated that it originated in 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland, where Dr. Fauci is working, just down the street.

It has been said that global warming doesn't have to kill anyone just yet. Most likely this remains true, but belief in global warming has now killed over a million people.

If you think this is a bit of a stretch, remember that Voltaire predicted such a possibility when he said, "Anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. " Global warming is the greatest absurdity of modern times – it cannot happen in theory and it has not happened in practice. A great absurdity creates an appropriate atrocity.

David Archibald is the author of American Gripen: The Solution to the F-35 Nightmare

Like this:

To like Loading…

Related Articles